Home  ›  Late 20th Century Cubism Style of Art of Human Figurepostmoderism

Late 20th Century Cubism Style of Art of Human Figurepostmoderism

Written By Sunday, April 24, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Early-20th-century avant-garde art movement

Non to be confused with QBism.

Cubism is an early-20th-century avant-garde art motion that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and compages. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, cleaved upward and reassembled in an abstracted form—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject area from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the subject in a greater context.[ane] Cubism has been considered the about influential art movement of the 20th century.[2] [3] The term is broadly used in association with a wide diversity of art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or near Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.

The movement was pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[4] I main influence that led to Cubism was the representation of three-dimensional class in the late works of Paul Cézanne.[5] A retrospective of Cézanne'due south paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, electric current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by two commemorative retrospectives after his death in 1907.[6]

In French republic, offshoots of Cubism developed, including Orphism, abstract art and later Purism.[7] [viii] The bear upon of Cubism was far-reaching and wide-ranging. In France and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Fine art Deco developed in response to Cubism. Early Futurist paintings agree in common with Cubism the fusing of the by and the present, the representation of different views of the subject pictured at the same time or successively, also chosen multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[9] while Constructivism was influenced by Picasso'due south technique of constructing sculpture from separate elements.[10] Other common threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modern life.

History [edit]

Historians accept divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the first phase of Cubism, known every bit Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined past Juan Gris a posteriori,[11] was both radical and influential every bit a brusque but highly meaning art move betwixt 1910 and 1912 in France. A second phase, Synthetic Cubism, remained vital until around 1919, when the Surrealist movement gained popularity. English art historian Douglas Cooper proposed another scheme, describing three phases of Cubism in his book, The Cubist Epoch. According to Cooper there was "Early Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the movement was initially developed in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the 2nd stage being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which time Juan Gris emerged every bit an important exponent (after 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Belatedly Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) equally the last stage of Cubism equally a radical advanced movement.[12] Douglas Cooper's restrictive use of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a lesser extent) implied an intentional value judgement.[5]

Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Figure dans un Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on canvas, 92.one × 73 cm, Tate Modern, London

Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]

Cubism burgeoned between 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso'due south 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has frequently been considered a proto-Cubist work.

In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque's exhibition at Kahnweiler's gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles called Braque a daring man who despises form, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[xiv] [15]

Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the fourth dimension, "Braque has just sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting made of fiddling cubes".[15] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse's words and spoke of Braque'south little cubes. The motif of the viaduct at l'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce 3 paintings marked by the simplification of form and deconstruction of perspective.[16]

Georges Braque's 1908 Houses at L'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes made by Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, as the first Cubist paintings. The offset organized group exhibition by Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the spring of 1911 in a room called 'Salle 41'; it included works by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, yet no works by Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[v]

Past 1911 Picasso was recognized as the inventor of Cubism, while Braque's importance and precedence was argued later on, with respect to his handling of infinite, volume and mass in the L'Estaque landscapes. Just "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to be called Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Green: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[v]

The assertion that the Cubist delineation of space, mass, time, and volume supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the sail was made by Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler every bit early every bit 1920,[18] but it was subject to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, specially past Clement Greenberg.[nineteen]

Contemporary views of Cubism are complex, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were as well distinct from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered just secondary to them. Alternative interpretations of Cubism accept therefore developed. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were later associated with the "Salle 41" artists, due east.g., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who beginning in late 1911 formed the core of the Section d'Or (or the Puteaux Group); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine as well equally Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such as Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (after 1916), María Blanchard (subsequently 1916) and Georges Valmier (later 1918). More fundamentally, Christopher Greenish argues that Douglas Cooper'south terms were "later undermined past interpretations of the work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[5]

John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram being a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram need not eschew sure aspects of appearance simply these too will be treated as signs not as imitations or recreations."[20]

Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]

Albert Gleizes, 50'Homme au Balcon, Man on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on sail, 195.6 × 114.9 cm (77 × 45 1/4 in.), Philadelphia Museum of Fine art. Completed the same twelvemonth that Albert Gleizes co-authored the volume Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Armory testify, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913

There was a distinct difference betwixt Kahnweiler's Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a bottom extent) gained the support of a single committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an almanac income for the sectional right to buy their works. Kahnweiler sold only to a small circle of connoisseurs. His support gave his artists the freedom to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained in that location until after the Offset World War. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[v]

In contrast, the Salon Cubists congenital their reputation primarily by exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major non-bookish Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more enlightened of public response and the need to communicate.[5] Already in 1910 a grouping began to class which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier's studio nearly the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées often included writers such equally Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other young artists, the grouping wanted to emphasise a research into grade, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist emphasis on color.[21]

Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), made a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier equally "ignorant geometers, reducing the human body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months later, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was after reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]

The first public controversy generated by Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the spring of 1911. This showing by Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attending of the general public for the kickoff time. Amongst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Tower, Tour Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]

The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Autumn Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911. Picasso'southward 1908 Seated Woman (Meditation) is reproduced along with a photo of the artist in his studio (upper left). Metzinger'southward Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced top correct. Besides reproduced are works by Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photo of Braque

At the Salon d'Automne of the same twelvemonth, in addition to the Indépendants group of Salle 41, were exhibited works past André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the October 8, 1911 issue of The New York Times. This article was published a yr subsequently Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and two years prior to the Arsenal Evidence, which introduced astonished Americans, accustomed to realistic art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times commodity portrayed works by Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated before 1909; not exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The article was titled The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Autumn Salon and subtitled Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Art Exhibition – What Its Followers Endeavour to Do. [27] [28]

Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is attracting then much attending as the boggling productions of the so-called "Cubist" school. In fact, dispatches from Paris advise that these works are hands the principal feature of the exhibition. [...]

In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is fairly respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases before which Paris has stood and at present once again stands in blank anaesthesia.

What do they hateful? Have those responsible for them taken get out of their senses? Is it art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]

Salon des Indépendants [edit]

The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (20 March to sixteen May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp'due south Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself caused a scandal, even amongst the Cubists. It was in fact rejected by the hanging committee, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the work was shown in the Salon de la Section d'Or in October 1912 and the 1913 Armory Testify in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and former colleagues for censoring his work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new addition to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Fine art Institute of Chicago), while Metzinger'south two showings included La Femme au Cheval (Adult female with a equus caballus) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Denmark).[30] Delaunay'southward monumental La Ville de Paris (Musée d'art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger'southward La Noce, The Nuptials (Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris), were likewise exhibited.

Galeries Dalmau [edit]

In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the commencement declared group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, 20 Apr to ten May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works by 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral's clan with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the paper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 was exhibited for the first time.[39]

Extensive media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) earlier, during and after the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau as a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, it was not always positive. Manufactures were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [forty] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a serial of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau show: "No dubiousness that the exhibition produced a strong commotion in the public, who welcomed it with a lot of suspicion.[42]

Salon d'Automne [edit]

The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the utilise of authorities owned buildings, such as the Grand Palais, to exhibit such artwork. The indignation of the politician Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front folio of Le Journal, 5 October 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Council of Paris, leading to a debate in the Chambre des Députés nearly the use of public funds to provide the venue for such fine art.[44] The Cubists were defended past the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]

Information technology was against this groundwork of public acrimony that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published past Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English and Russian in 1913).[47] Among the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier's vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked past Bears) at present at Rhode Island Schoolhouse of Design Museum, Joseph Csaky's Deux Femme, 2 Women (a sculpture now lost), in addition to the highly abstract paintings by Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Spring) (Museum of Modernistic Art, New York).

Brainchild and the ready-fabricated [edit]

The most extreme forms of Cubism were not those expert by Picasso and Braque, who resisted total abstraction. Other Cubists, by contrast, specially František Kupka, and those considered Orphists by Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accepted brainchild past removing visible subject field matter entirely. Kupka'southward ii entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstract (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 adult an expressive and allusive abstraction dedicated to circuitous emotional and sexual themes. First in 1912 Delaunay painted a series of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed past a serial entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with vivid prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his divergence from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-complete. In 1913–14 Léger produced a series entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a similar stress to color, line and form. His Cubism, despite its abstract qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and modernistic life. Apollinaire supported these early developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the bailiwick was vacated. But in spite of his apply of the term Orphism these works were so different that they defy attempts to identify them in a single category.[v]

Also labeled an Orphist by Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for some other extreme development inspired past Cubism. The ready-made arose from a joint consideration that the work itself is considered an object (only as a painting), and that it uses the cloth detritus of the world (as collage and papier collé in the Cubist structure and Aggregation). The adjacent logical footstep, for Duchamp, was to present an ordinary object equally a self-sufficient piece of work of art representing only itself. In 1913 he attached a cycle bicycle to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a bottle-drying rack as a sculpture in its ain correct.[5]

Section d'Or [edit]

The Section d'Or, also known as Groupe de Puteaux, founded by some of the most conspicuous Cubists, was a collective of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, active from 1911 through about 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Section d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, October 1912, was arguably the most of import pre-World War I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a wide audience. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their development from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the allure of a Cubist retrospective.[48]

The group seems to have adopted the name Section d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism developed in parallel by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to show that Cubism, rather than being an isolated fine art-class, represented the continuation of a chiliad tradition (indeed, the gold ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of diverse interests for at to the lowest degree ii,400 years).[49]

The idea of the Section d'Or originated in the course of conversations betwixt Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The grouping'due south title was suggested past Villon, after reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della Pittura by Joséphin Péladan.

During the tardily 19th and early 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American fine art. Artists such as Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired by the stark power and simplicity of styles of those strange cultures. Effectually 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a time when both artists had recently acquired an interest in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, perhaps leading to Picasso entering a new period in his work by 1907, marked past the influence of Greek, Iberian and African fine art. Picasso'due south paintings of 1907 have been characterized equally Protocubism, as notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the antecedent of Cubism.[13]

The art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were particularly influential to the formation of Cubism and especially of import to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[l] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is generally referred to as the showtime Cubist pic. This is an exaggeration, for although it was a major first pace towards Cubism it is not yet Cubist. The disruptive, expressionist chemical element in it is even contrary to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the world in a detached, realistic spirit. All the same, the Demoiselles is the logical picture to take as the starting betoken for Cubism, considering information technology marks the birth of a new pictorial idiom, because in it Picasso violently overturned established conventions and because all that followed grew out of it."[13]

The near serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles as the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar caption "fails to give adequate consideration to the complexities of a flourishing fine art that existed just before and during the period when Picasso'southward new painting developed."[51] Between 1905 and 1908, a witting search for a new fashion caused rapid changes in art across French republic, Federal republic of germany, Kingdom of the netherlands, Italia, and Russia. The Impressionists had used a double point of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who also admired Cézanne) flattened the picture airplane, reducing their subjects to unproblematic geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist structure and subject thing, nearly notably to be seen in the works of Georges Seurat (e.m., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was another important influence. There were also parallels in the development of literature and social thought.[51]

In addition to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to exist found in the ii distinct tendencies of Cézanne's later work: first his breaking of the painted surface into small multifaceted areas of pigment, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given by binocular vision, and second his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. However, the cubists explored this concept further than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a single moving picture airplane, equally if the objects had all their faces visible at the same time. This new kind of depiction revolutionized the fashion objects could be visualized in painting and art.

The historical study of Cubism began in the belatedly 1920s, cartoon at showtime from sources of limited data, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. It came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler's book Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "analytical" and "synthetic" which later emerged accept been widely accepted since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred afterwards the facts they identify. Neither phase was designated as such at the time corresponding works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism as Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our but fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that limited definition."[51]

The traditional interpretation of "Cubism", formulated post facto every bit a means of agreement the works of Braque and Picasso, has affected our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. It is hard to employ to painters such every bit Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose fundamental differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to call them Cubists at all. According to Daniel Robbins, "To suggest that merely considering these artists developed differently or varied from the traditional pattern they deserved to be relegated to a secondary or satellite role in Cubism is a profound mistake."[51]

The history of the term "Cubism" usually stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connection with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice past the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a similar context. Nevertheless, the discussion "cube" was used in 1906 by some other critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference non to Picasso or Braque merely rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:

"M. Metzinger is a mosaicist like M. Signac but he brings more precision to the cutting of his cubes of color which appear to have been made mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]

The critical use of the word "cube" goes back at least to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a large and foursquare pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. One even wonders why the artist has non used cubes of solid matter diversely colored: they would make pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]

The term Cubism did not come into general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accustomed the term on behalf of a group of artists invited to exhibit at the Brussels Indépendants. The following year, in preparation for the Salon de la Section d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an effort to dispel the defoliation raging effectually the word, and as a major defence of Cubism (which had caused a public scandal post-obit the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims every bit artists, this work was the first theoretical treatise on Cubism and it still remains the clearest and most intelligible. The result, not solely a collaboration between its ii authors, reflected discussions by the circle of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. Information technology mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of it were read prior to publication.[5] [51] The concept adult in Du "Cubisme" of observing a subject from unlike points in space and time simultaneously, i.due east., the act of moving around an object to seize it from several successive angles fused into a single paradigm (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a more often than not recognized device used by the Cubists.[56]

The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" by Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a collection of reflections and commentaries by Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso beginning in 1905, and Braque starting time in 1907, but gave equally much attention to artists such equally Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[5]

The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to show the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their work comprehensible to a broad audience (art critics, art collectors, art dealers and the general public). Undoubtedly, due to the great success of the exhibition, Cubism became avant-garde motility recognized as a genre or style in fine art with a specific common philosophy or goal.[48]

Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]

A significant modification of Cubism betwixt 1914 and 1916 was signaled by a shift towards a potent emphasis on big overlapping geometric planes and flat surface activeness. This grouping of styles of painting and sculpture, especially significant between 1917 and 1920, was practiced by several artists; especially those under contract with the art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of society reflected in these works, led to its beingness referred to past the critic Maurice Raynal as 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested past Cubists prior to the first of Earth State of war I—such equally the fourth dimension, dynamism of modern life, the occult, and Henri Bergson's concept of elapsing—had now been vacated, replaced by a purely formal frame of reference.[57]

Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à l'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—past those who served the armed forces and by those who remained in the civilian sector—to escape the realities of the Smashing State of war, both during and directly following the conflict. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French club and French culture.[v]

Cubism after 1918 [edit]

The most innovative period of Cubism was before 1914[ citation needed ]. After World War I, with the support given by the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned as a central issue for artists, and connected equally such until the mid-1920s when its avant-garde status was rendered questionable by the emergence of geometric abstraction and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, fifty-fifty well later 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the piece of work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In France, yet, Cubism experienced a decline beginning in about 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited not but the artists stranded past Kahnweiler'due south exile but others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de l'Endeavour Moderne in Paris. Attempts were made by Louis Vauxcelles to fence that Cubism was dead, but these exhibitions, along with a well-organized Cubist show at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the same twelvemonth, demonstrated it was however alive.[5]

The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the appearance from about 1917–24 of a coherent trunk of theoretical writing by Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, among the artists, by Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative piece of work either exclusively or alongside Cubist work—experienced by many artists during this flow (called Neoclassicism) has been linked to the tendency to evade the realities of the war and also to the cultural authorization of a classical or Latin image of France during and immediately following the state of war. Cubism later 1918 tin can exist seen as part of a broad ideological shift towards conservatism in both French society and civilisation. Notwithstanding, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both within the oeuvre of individual artists, such as Gris and Metzinger, and beyond the work of artists as unlike from each other every bit Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism as a publicly debated motion became relatively unified and open up to definition. Its theoretical purity made it a gauge against which such diverse tendencies as Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and brainchild could exist compared.[5]

Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914

Influence in Asia [edit]

Japan and Mainland china were among the first countries in Asia to be influenced by Cubism. Contact first occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for example those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought dorsum with them both an agreement of modern art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu's Self Portrait with Cherry-red Eyes (1912) and Fang Ganmin'south Melody in Autumn (1934).[59] [60]

Interpretation [edit]

Intentions and criticism [edit]

The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more than than a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their work. "It is past no means clear, in whatever example," wrote Christopher Green, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their evolution of such techniques as faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well take arrived at such practices with footling knowledge of 'true' Cubism in its early on stages, guided above all by their own understanding of Cézanne." The works exhibited by these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended beyond the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, notwithstanding-life and landscape—favored by Picasso and Braque to include large-scale modern-life subjects. Aimed at a big public, these works stressed the use of multiple perspective and complex planar faceting for expressive effect while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[5]

In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of time to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'duration' proposed past the philosopher Henri Bergson co-ordinate to which life is subjectively experienced as a continuum, with the past flowing into the present and the present merging into the futurity. The Salon Cubists used the faceted treatment of solid and space and furnishings of multiple viewpoints to convey a physical and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions betwixt past, present and future. I of the major theoretical innovations fabricated by the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[5] drawing to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of split spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective developed during the Renaissance was vacated. The bailiwick matter was no longer considered from a specific signal of view at a moment in fourth dimension, just built following a option of successive viewpoints, i.e., every bit if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the eye free to roam from one to the other.[56]

This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative motion) is pushed to a high caste of complication in Metzinger'south Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' monumental Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Section d'Or; Le Fauconnier'due south Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay'southward Urban center of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These ambitious works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger's The Wedding, too shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave form to the notion of simultaneity by presenting unlike motifs every bit occurring within a single temporal frame, where responses to the by and present interpenetrate with collective force. The conjunction of such subject affair with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early Futurist paintings past Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves fabricated in response to early Cubism.[9]

Cubism and modern European fine art was introduced into the The states at the at present legendary 1913 Arsenal Show in New York City, which then traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Armory testify Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Caput of a Woman (Fernande) (1909–10), Les Arbres (1907) amongst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited vii important and large drypoints, while his brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and L'Homme au balcon (1912), two highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko too contributed examples of their cubist works.

Cubist sculpture [edit]

Frontal view of the same bronze cast, forty.5 × 23 × 26 cm

These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]

Just as in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne's reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And just every bit in painting, it became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.

Cubist sculpture developed in parallel to Cubist painting. During the fall of 1909 Picasso sculpted Head of a Woman (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative space and vice versa. Co-ordinate to Douglas Cooper: "The first true Cubist sculpture was Picasso'south impressive Woman's Caput, modeled in 1909–x, a counterpart in three dimensions to many similar analytical and faceted heads in his paintings at the time."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited by Alexander Archipenko in 1912–thirteen, for instance in Woman Walking.[5] Joseph Csaky, after Archipenko, was the first sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and so in 1914 past Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]

Indeed, Cubist structure was equally influential every bit any pictorial Cubist innovation. It was the stimulus behind the proto-Constructivist work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-bespeak for the entire constructive tendency in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[five]

Architecture [edit]

Le Corbusier, Assembly edifice, Chandigarh, Bharat

Cubism formed an important link betwixt early on-20th-century art and architecture.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships between avant-garde practices in painting, sculpture and architecture had early ramifications in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Czechoslovakia. Though in that location are many points of intersection between Cubism and compages, only a few direct links between them can exist fatigued. About frequently the connections are made by reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of course, spatial ambiguity, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]

Architectural interest in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of three-dimensional form, using simple geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Diverse elements could be superimposed, made transparent or penetrate one another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had become an influential cistron in the development of modern architecture from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, past Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such as Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of edifice pattern, the use of materials appropriate to industrial product, and the increased use of drinking glass.[66]

Cubism was relevant to an architecture seeking a style that needed not refer to the past. Thus, what had become a revolution in both painting and sculpture was applied as office of "a profound reorientation towards a changed world".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in avant-garde architecture. The influential De Stijl movement embraced the aesthetic principles of Neo-plasticism developed by Piet Mondrian nether the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was besides linked by Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. However, the linking of basic geometric forms with inherent beauty and ease of industrial application—which had been prefigured by Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (meliorate known as Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier's ambition had been to translate the properties of his own style of Cubism to compages. Betwixt 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier full-bodied his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies soon avant-garde into many different architectural projects.[68]

La Maison Cubiste (Cubist Business firm) [edit]

Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Written report for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist House). Image published in Les Peintres Cubistes, by Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913

Le Salon Bourgeois, designed by André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts section of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger's Femme à fifty'Éventail on the left wall

At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that quickly became known every bit Maison Cubiste (Cubist Business firm), with compages by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior decoration by André Mare along with a group of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the aggregation of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote about the democratic nature of art, stressing the point that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of art. Decorative work, to them, was the "antithesis of the motion-picture show". "The true picture" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être within itself. It tin can be moved from a church to a drawing-room, from a museum to a study. Essentially contained, necessarily complete, it demand not immediately satisfy the heed: on the contrary, it should lead it, little by piffling, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative low-cal resides. It does not harmonize with this or that ensemble; information technology harmonizes with things in general, with the universe: it is an organism...".[69]

La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model house, with a facade, a staircase, wrought atomic number 26 banisters, and 2 rooms: a living room—the Salon Bourgeois, where paintings by Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Adult female with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a sleeping accommodation. It was an example of L'fine art décoratif, a home within which Cubist art could exist displayed in the comfort and way of modern, bourgeois life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed by Duchamp-Villon, to the 2 furnished rooms.[70] This architectural installation was subsequently exhibited at the 1913 Armory Testify, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York exhibit as Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]

Jacques Doucet'south hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine

The effects, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed past André Mare, and were early examples of the influence of cubism on what would get Art Deco. They were composed of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.

Mare called the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Bourgeois. Léger described this name equally 'perfect'. In a letter to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely fantabulous for us, really splendid. People will see Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very important.[ii]

"Mare'southward ensembles were accepted every bit frames for Cubist works considering they immune paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Light-green wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the involvement non only of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, but of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare's old friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]

In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the decoration of a Studio House, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed by the architect Paul Ruaud and owned by the French mode designer Jacques Doucet, too a collector of Post-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought directly from Picasso's studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet's staircase,[75] Lipchitz made the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis made a Cubist rug.[76] [77] [78]

Czech Cubist compages [edit]

The original Cubist architecture is very rare. Cubism was practical to architecture only in Bohemia (today Czech Democracy) and especially in its capital, Prague.[79] [eighty] Czech architects were the first and only ones to ever design original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the nigh part betwixt 1910 and 1914, but the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were likewise congenital later on Earth War I. After the war, the architectural fashion called Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist architecture with round shapes.[82]

In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the matter and calm contained in information technology, through a creative idea, and then that the result would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should be achieved past shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, by arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-similar units, reminiscent of the so-called diamond cut, or even cavernous that are reminiscent of the belatedly Gothic compages. In this way, the entire surfaces of the facades including even the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles also as other architectural ornaments attain a 3-dimensional form. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were also created, e. thou. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects besides designed Cubist furniture.

The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked mostly in Prague merely likewise in other Bohemian towns. The best-known Cubist edifice is the House of the Black Madonna in the Former Town of Prague built in 1912 by Josef Gočár with the only Cubist café in the world, Grand Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the entrance pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses under Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has also been preserved near the Wenceslas Square, designed by Emil Králíček in 1912, who also built the Diamond House in the New Town of Prague around 1913.

Cubism in other fields [edit]

The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, outside painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein employ repetition and repetitive phrases equally building blocks in both passages and whole capacity. Near of Stein's important works utilize this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Not just were they the get-go important patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were likewise of import influences on Cubism likewise. In turn, Picasso was an important influence on Stein'due south writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner's 1930 novel Every bit I Lay Dying can be read as an interaction with the cubist way. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of 15 characters which, when taken together, produce a single cohesive body.

The poets mostly associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. Every bit American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in verse "is the conscious, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new artistic entity made self-sufficient by its rigorous architecture. This is quite different from the free association of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Still, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the later movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our firsthand elder, the exemplary poet."[84] Though not besides remembered as the Cubist painters, these poets continue to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett accept recently produced new translations of Reverdy's work. Wallace Stevens' "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" is as well said to demonstrate how cubism's multiple perspectives tin can exist translated into poetry.[85]

John Berger said: "It is almost incommunicable to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts as peachy as that which took identify in the early Renaissance. Its furnishings on after art, on film, and on compages are already so numerous that we hardly notice them."[86]

Gallery [edit]

  • Pablo Picasso, 1913–xiv, Femme assise dans un fauteuil (Eva), Woman in an Armchair, oil on sail, 149.nine x 99.4 cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Collection

  • Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on canvas, 142 x 100.3 cm, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Ohio

  • Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de L'Accordéon (The Squeeze box Thespian), Museo del Novecento, Milan

Printing manufactures and reviews [edit]

  • (center) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Man with Pipe), Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano II), (right) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, thirteen March 1914

  • Paintings by Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Adult female in Blue, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Art Gallery; and sculpture by Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, due north. 1529, 13 Oct 1912

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, Fifty'autobus. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, fourteen March 1920

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Man on a Balcony, Fifty'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–13, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (connected), n. 1916, 14 March 1920

  • Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Study for Human being in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; August Agero, sculpture, Bust; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Spectacles, or Banjo and Spectacles. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912

  • Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Souvenir d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, 1 December 1912

  • Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, ix March 1913. Picabia held his get-go i-man show in New York, Exhibition of New York studies past Francis Picabia, at 291 art gallery (formerly Little Galleries of the Photo-Secession), March 17 - Apr 5, 1913

See also [edit]

  • Time in fine art
  • Precisionism
  • Proto-Cubism
  • Rayonism
  • Department d'Or

References [edit]

  1. ^ Jean Metzinger, Notation sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), October–November 1910
  2. ^ a b Christopher Light-green, MoMA collection, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Press, 2009 Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Auto
  4. ^ Christopher Green, MoMA collection Cubism, Origins and awarding of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Press, 2009 Archived 2014-06-13 at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ a b c d eastward f k h i j thou 50 m due north o p q r Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Press Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The University of Iowa Museum of Fine art, J. Paul Getty Trust, Academy of Washington Printing 1985, pp. 34–42
  7. ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009
  8. ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Abstraction, Heilbrunn Timeline of Fine art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2000
  9. ^ a b Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Formation, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2008-x-24 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ^ Honor, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A Globe History of Art. 7th edn. London: Laurence King Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
  12. ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. 11–221, 232, Phaidon Press Express 1970 in association with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art ISBN 0-87587-041-iv
  13. ^ a b c Cooper, 24
  14. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, 14 November 1908, Gallica (BnF)
  15. ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Futurism in Paris – The Avant-garde Explosion, Centre Pompidou, Paris 2008
  17. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
  18. ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
  19. ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-paper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–9, threescore–61; repr. as 'Collage' in Fine art and Civilization (Boston, 1961), pp. lxx–83
  20. ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
  21. ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2008.
  22. ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March eighteen, 1910.
  23. ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Center of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Hindsight, The University of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press
  24. ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
  25. ^ "Eiffel Belfry". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on Feb 28, 2014.
  26. ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". world wide web.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016.
  27. ^ a b "Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Electric current Fine art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Attempt to Practice". October 8, 1911. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
  28. ^ a b "The "Cubists" Boss Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911 (High-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
  29. ^ Philadelphia Museum of Art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 Archived 2017-09-eighteen at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Woman with a Equus caballus, oil on sail, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on January fifteen, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Marker Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, University of Chicago Printing, 2008, pp. 293–295
  32. ^ Carol A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Spain, 1898–1936, University of Chicago Press, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
  33. ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Fine art – ACCA
  34. ^ Mercè Vidal, L'exposició d'Art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
  35. ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of War: The Advanced and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale University Printing, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
  36. ^ "Exposició d'Art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
  37. ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Car (Barcelona) 18 April 1912, Any 22, núm. 4637–4652 (16–30 abr. 1912)
  38. ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912 (includes numerous articles on the artists and exhibition)
  39. ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale University Press, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
  40. ^ Cubist caricature, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (3 maig 1912)
  41. ^ a b "[Exposició d'Art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
  42. ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
  43. ^ "Le Periodical". Gallica. October five, 1912. Archived from the original on September four, 2015.
  44. ^ a b Journal officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, 3 Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Athenaeum de l'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine. ISSN 1270-5942
  45. ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand fifty'fine art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an account of the argue.
  46. ^ "biography". www.peterbrooke.org.uk. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
  47. ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September eighteen, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-18.
  48. ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. v". Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  49. ^ "La Section d'Or, Numéro spécial, nine Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on April three, 2017.
  50. ^ Cooper, xx–27
  51. ^ a b c d e f g Robbins, Daniel (April 19, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Internet Annal.
  52. ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac's influence, referring to Metzinger'due south "precision in the cut of his cubes..."
  53. ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
  54. ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
  55. ^ "Mercure de France : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. December i, 1912. Archived from the original on September iv, 2015.
  56. ^ a b Cottington, David (Apr nineteen, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester University Printing. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on January 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Christopher Green, Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
  58. ^ "The Museum of Modernistic Art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-eleven .
  59. ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.M.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
  60. ^ Annal, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Report". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
  61. ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Art Institute of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
  62. ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Head of a Adult female, statuary, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Machine, Blue Mountain Project, Princeton University
  63. ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Fine art History 2 (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
  64. ^ Balas, Edith (April nineteen, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Mod Sculpture. American Philosophical Society. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on January ane, 2016 – via Google Books.
  65. ^ a b Compages and cubism. Center canadien d'architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture : MIT Press. April xix, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open WorldCat.
  66. ^ a b c "The Collection | MoMA". The Museum of Modern Fine art. Archived from the original on Apr five, 2012.
  67. ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Design in the Kickoff Machine Age (London, 1960), p. 203
  68. ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. ten–xi. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-7
  69. ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June two, 2013.
  70. ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
  71. ^ Kubistische werken op de Armory Prove Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Car
  72. ^ "Detail of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family unit papers and Armory Show records, 1859-1984, bulk 1900-1949". world wide web.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  73. ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of modern fine art: at the Armory of the Sixty-ninth Infantry". Clan of American Painters and Sculptors. Apr 19, 1913 – via Net Archive.
  74. ^ Greenish, Christopher (Jan 1, 2000). Art in France, 1900-1940. Yale University Printing. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on November 30, 2016 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Green, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky's staircase in the home of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on thirty April 2016. Retrieved eighteen December 2012.
  76. ^ Rex, Aestheticus (14 April 2011). "Jacques Doucet's Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012.
  77. ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in France, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale University Press. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on thirty Apr 2016. Retrieved eighteen Dec 2012.
  78. ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. 5. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on 30 Apr 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  79. ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. ix. ISBN978-eighty-7281-469-5.
  80. ^ "Cubism". www.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  81. ^ "Cubist architecture". www.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved one September 2015.
  82. ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". www.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on 8 October 2015. Retrieved one September 2015.
  83. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Poetry of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-19. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  84. ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Title Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-eleven .
  85. ^ "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
  86. ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-4.

Further reading [edit]

  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstract Fine art, New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1936.
  • Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Impact of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-4-four.
  • Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in clan with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art & the Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN0-87587-041-4.
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
  • John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Assay, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
  • Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Rebel 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-1
  • Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The University of Chicago Press, 2008
  • Christopher Green, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Fine art, 1916–28, Yale University Press, New Oasis and London, 1987
  • Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Pop-Art. Translated and with an Introduction past David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian by Iskusstvo, 1968)
  • Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Art Periodical, Vol. 41, No. four, (Winter 1981)
  • Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Section d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'art, Paris, 2000
  • Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Compages in Prague, 2004

External links [edit]

  • Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du 1000 Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
  • Czech Cubist Architecture
  • Cubism, Guggenheim Collection Online
  • Index of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Research Middle for Mod Fine art, Metropolitan Museum of Fine art
  • Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Mode: Mainstreaming Modernism subsequently the Arsenal, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. 1 (Spring 2014), pp. 1–28. doi:10.1086/675687

moodylingthe.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism

0 Response to "Late 20th Century Cubism Style of Art of Human Figurepostmoderism"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel